Tweets
Contributing Editors

Search
From the Blogs
DISCLAIMER

The information on this site does not constitute legal advice and is for educational purposes only. If you have a dispute or legal problem, please consult an attorney licensed to practice law in your state. Additionally, the information and views presented on this blog are solely the responsibility of Justin Bathon personally, or the other contributors, personally, and do not represent the views of the University of Kentucky or the institutional employer of any of the contributing editors.

« American University Law Review Symposium on Tinker | Main | Harrison and Harrison on the NCAA and Antitrust Law »
Tuesday
Sep152009

Gigs Up Anti-Bullying Laws

The AP is calling them out:

Forty-four states expressly ban bullying, a legislative legacy of a rash of school shootings in the late '90s, yet few if any of those measures have identified children who excessively pick on their peers, an Associated Press review has found. And few offer any method for ensuring the policies are enforced, according to data compiled by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Anti-bullying laws have long been sort of a running joke amongst ed. law types who knew the laws had no teeth. They are a good political measure, and they may even be an adequate policy measure, but as a legal concept they are sort of like one of those "study groups" that gets formed in Washington ... pure window dressing.

It will be interesting to see if now that the secret is out these laws begin to toughen up. Legally it is a hard sell, which is why they were not tough in the first place, but I don't think we've really seen a super-creative anti-bullying law yet. I for one really hope we don't see them get tougher. We toughened up zero-tolerance policies only to loosen them later and I would expect a similar pattern here if these laws begin to have real penalties. The bottom line is that school officials just need the flexibility in this area and the weak anti-bullying laws keep that in place.

h/t Alexander Russo

Reader Comments (1)

Yes as a parent I would have to agree. ANti Bullying programs are laughable at any level. The only TRUE purpose and the only TRUE motivation for these laws was so schools could be protected from being sued if a child gets physically hurt on school property in a bullying situation. These laws were NEVER meant to protect the victims of bullying. Once an anti bullying policy is in place in a school the school can use the defense.. "We have an anti bullying program in place" This isn't about the kids.... Wise up..I actually went over to the kids house that was bullying my son and told the kids Dad if it happened again I'd be coming back for a visit. Worked like a a champ. Gotta love parental responsibilty.... hahahahahaha. Get involved parents. If you won't stand up for your kids then how can you ever expect them to stand up for themselves???

November 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSteve

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>