So, for my scholarly post for the week, I am going to talk about my democratic vision for school law. I have been teaching school law for a few years now and I have been
consistently struck by the idea that we education law folks are very
good at teaching our content areas such as torts and contracts (I would
argue we do the best job in all of ed. leader prep., but that might get
me in a little trouble). However, in my experience, we are not so good
at teaching about the law or providing a vision for why
school personnel need to know about the law. Specifically, I do not
think we are talking nearly enough about how democracy works, the
school's role within democratic systems, and how the school code is
nothing but a public articulation of their intentions for schools.
I've
read a lot of school law texts and democracy is rarely, if ever,
mentioned. I just did a quick scan of all the school law texts on my
shelf and I didn't see the word democracy mentioned in any of their
opening pages. This is very unfortunate in my opinion because we are
failing to articulate the fundamental justification for our work.
So,
if not some democratic rationale, you may ask, how do we currently justify legal
education for school personnel? Well, there are a few different
patterns. First, there is the "your gonna need this" tact ... consider Alexander and Alexander (1):
it is necessary for the school law student to be versed in certain fundamental concepts of the American legal system and to be able to apply this knowledge to situations that daily affect school operation.Then, there is the fear tactic ... consider Underwood and Webb (vii):
Education is rife with laws, regulations, processes, and procedures. Educators are expected to know and act within all of these boundaries. Classroom teachers face a daunting array of legal responsibilities and confront myriad legal issues on an almost daily basis. ... America has become an increasingly litigious society. [Cite Stats on lawsuits and fear of litigation].Of course, there is the fixing misunderstandings angle ... consider Thomas, Cambron-McCabe and McCarthy (xii):
Many teachers and administrators harbor misunderstandings regarding basic legal concepts that are being applied to education institutions. As a result, they are uncertain about the legality of daily decisions they make in the operation of schools.A popular one these days is the "preventative law" argument that can supposedly save us all money ... consider Redfield (xii):
Understanding the law will help educational leaders in discerning current responsibilities as well as in predicting future responsibilities and liabilities. Such understanding can help educators and advocates in determining what is and is not a legal issue, when to appropriately consult legal counsel, and how to minimize conflict.And, then there is sometimes a "its your responsibility" tact. Consider this single line, without any further articulation, from Russo (1):
"Public schooling in the United States is an instrumentality for carrying out a function that society agrees is a desirable one, the education of all children of all the people."Then, the books all launch into the constitution, federalism, school boards, the judicial system ... and then into topical areas ... torts, church/state, special education, etc. And many go directly to largely caselaw with some followup analysis. All of the texts have a little more to say and admittedly I quoted only the parts most relevant for this entry, but none go over 1-2 pages of additional explanation about the nature of law in the representative, constitutional, liberal democracy that is the United States and the various states within it.